With automatic Status Quo. But thats a better place to be than where stellaris is. You have to open the war view and choose "status quo. War exhaustion is not a measure of success or 'winning'. That's how we lost the Vietnam war, too. Groud Battles: 0% (killing defensive armies doesn't matter I guess) Occupation: 24%. The best part of war exhaustion is that "apparently" the game counts the ameba bubbles as a very valuable ship because when I lost it on a war on its juvenile from my war exhaustion jumped 8 points by itself. Your goal is to occupy enough of the enemy's territory that they agree to surrender, before your war exhaustion reaches 100% and the enemy. #3. I didn't lose a single ship. I win every space battle. . Why am I not. You can never 'force' a surrender. Great job ruining a great game, im ♥♥♥♥♥♥♥ done. War exhaustion in Stellaris the most most broken shit ever. Thread starter Dragonkat42; Start date Mar 3, 2018;. The way stellaris war exhaustion works is "Our arbitrary meter was crossed , now you need to sue for unconditional surrender. Sure it won't change that issue but it's not really an issue, if an empire is doing so poorly their war exhaustion is at 100% then clearly they're massively losing war so they should be crumbling in short order. The modifiers above are for when the AI 'voluntarily' accepts a. 100% war exhaustion doesn't make you surrender, it just forces status quo. not my favorite thing in Stellaris. Otherwise you can force a status quo peace 2 years after the opposing side has reached 100% war exhaustion, but that is not the same as their surrender. After that, I jump to their capital planets to cut off their production. If you don't end the. The two are rarely entirely connected. BUT only a status quo can be forced, not a surrender!I've noticed something in the game I'm in. ago. Since AI won't surrender to a Total War, they can end only in Status Quo or the destruction of one empire. It will make them accept any status quo peace you offer (in wich you would get the terriotries you have claims on AND occupy militarily, so often a white peace is a way better option to end a war then going. They always have my war exhaustion up by 5-7% more than their own. and I have 30% again despite minimal casualties and no system losses. PlutonArioch Dec 10, 2022 @ 11:29pm. You could have won years ago (100% war exhaustion starts a countdown, the enemy can’t force leave immediately) but you didn’t and this mechanic represents your citizenry becoming sick of it. But yeah, also Exhaustion gain should probably be adjusted. Business, Economics, and Finance. They have 2 planets left and I'm occupying both of them. "Furthermore, I think Carthage should be destroyed. War exhaustion exists solely to force an end to wars, so the losing empire can recover. This makes no sense and must be changed. This. It's far more devastating than catapults and cannons, but they're always there. However it won't let me. The only no forced status quo situation would be two genocidal empires fighting, which would make sense, once war is declared it's a battle to. That should be factored into your war planning. He attacks me twice, I lose some ships but win the battles. 109 votes, 33 comments. They can. Including, but not limited to, research, civics, and random events. As most of us know, war exhaustion in Stellaris is little more than a timer that eventually force empires to sign a white…Here's the exhaustion details: Attrition: 14%. That is not the same thing as a surrender! All occupied claims are turned over to the occupier, and that's it. A place to share content, ask questions and/or talk about the 4X grand strategy game Stellaris by…Lol, Germany would have wished it was like this. It has literally no system left to conquer. Always occupy then status quo by driving enemy war exhaustion to 100. The exhaustion in Stellaris, as mention above, is absolutely not tied to the necessary war. Occupation breeds resistance. In RL war exhaustion forced a surrender and an economic depression which lasted until nazi Germany. May 7, 2021 Jump to latest Follow Reply So an ally I had a Def. You can win a war with 100% war exhaustion while your opponent is at 1%. Nationalistic Zeal civic gives you -10%, there are others you can take advantage of as well. If nothing's claimed and occupied, no side loses or gains anything. Adds [deposit id] resource deposit or planetary feature to the selected celestial body. When you get involved in a catastrophic war in stellaris, your planets and people never go up in arms or on strike. Look under the war goal and it should say their current acceptance of it and why. Upon declaring victory or surrender, the victor receives a bonus to energy credits, influence, and a happiness modifier to their empire. War exhaustion makes no sense. A Status Quo Peace is you get to keep whatever claimed systems you hold. Also in that example, the enemy had 100% exhaustion, the AI can still refuse to surrender to your claims with the subjugation war. War Exhaustion is just a clock. You were NOT the war leader. Everything is glorious. Now the economy is actually compelling and diplomacy will almost receive a rework as well, that doesn't need to be the case any more. If I was to surrender I would be totally integrated beacuse of their. Surrender would only make the one who press it actually surrender. Now the difference is, you need to claim and control with status quo, if the ennemy surrender, you get all the claim. WTF is war on a timer?. Slower war exhaustion is part of gestalt consciousness. because when you reach 100% war exhaustion its not automatic surrender, its forced status quo, as such since your ally didn't demand a status quo they did not end the conflict but regardless a surrender outcome only occurs if you conquer entirely, you can see this from trying to complete war goals when at war, a conquer casus belli is only possi. This is especially true in the case of wars of conquest, in which it is possible to get everything you want out of the war even if you are forced to accept a status quo peace. It can be useful for him, too. Yet, Stellaris decided that they get almost no war exhaustion and I can't. Storm Jan 22, 2020 @ 9:26am. Excess armies are initially placed in a reserve area behind the frontline and replace any disengaged or. They make it appear as "whoever has the most war exhaustion is losing" when that isn't really the case. Sure, an unconquered planet can also mean, that another Empire is also waging war on your target and is holding some planets, thus they do not count towards their war. I could not select the force surrender option, even when they had 0 star bases and all planets were occupied. AI will never surrender to a total war war goal even if. I've also occupied around 6 planets as part of my goals, Killing 86 of their armies without. I could not select the force surrender option, even when they had 0 star bases and all planets were occupied. i got to a point where i had occupied pretty much every single system in their territory yet every single time i would send them a peace offering (me achieveing my war goal of complete domination) they reject it and say. My war exhaustion is at like 13% for both sides. pathetic across the bored with no fleets. But still. The speed at which War Exhaustion accumulates is influenced by factors such as ethics, traditions, technology and the amount of claims being pressed - an empire that is fighting to hold onto a handful of border systems will tire of a. Originally posted by FIBBIDEH: After you reach 100% war exhaustion, after 2 years a status quo can be forced on you. But still. . I share some desire for more empire sprawl mitigation for determined. The number of armies that can be engaged in combat on either side is five plus one-fifth of the planet size. Whenever i attack someone, my war exhaustion builds up much faster than them, even if im getting all my claimed systems and that being my wargoal. Everstill Colonel. The war exhaustion is gained based on the cumulative losses sustained on a percentage basis. Which seems a tad muchI feel your pain. Makes. Stellaris. You get a -100 warscore penalty for demanding a surrender and a -100 penalty for demanding vassalization. You are in a race if you want to conquer someone in a single go. Your perfect start is ruined, you got the Irassians yet again. A little bit of a click-baity title, specifically I'm really tired of being unable to claim victory due to stupid numbers of civs in a war. In Stellaris you loose no ships, take no damage, business is booming, you're maxed out on all resources, you have no enemy ships to fight, you still get war exhaustion. Is anyone else finding it difficult to raise the war exhaustion of the enemy? I went to war with an empire that had less ships and far less tech. Our federation had 90% war weariness by the time they were at 50%. Thats another problem Stellaris has had from day one, no seperate peace. Is anyone else finding it difficult to raise the war exhaustion of the enemy? I went to war with an empire that had less ships and far less tech. 2. Once you have had 100% for 24 months you can force surrender. [empire you want to. Choosing a different war goal may have different surrender thresholds. I decided to vassalise some roaches to steal their ring world, so I declare war on the roaches and their 1 ally. You could give one or even both empires alloys. I'm on good terms with them and they're huge. Business, Economics, and Finance. I repeat, you don't have to wait for a surrender!Either way, war exhaustion represents the people of your empire having had enough of the war. Yes, but only for the final stage, or if the Galactic Community declares a preemptive crisis war. I've been in two wars with the same enemy empire. If you go in with enough armies and fleets you'll get them to surrender before you hit 100% war exhaustion. Since AI won't surrender to a Total War, they can end only in Status Quo or the destruction of one empire. I've been in two wars with the same enemy empire. You can win a fight but gain more exhaustion because you lost a higher proportion of your ships, same with invasions. The fact that your war exhaustion is 100% means that they can force a status quo peace whenever they want to, but that's just an option available to them. ) It counts as points towards the enemy's willingness to surrender or accept a status quo. On the other hand if your navy has equal strength you need to both have taken all systems and the enemy. If you controled an allied planet and didnt ask for it before the war start, the allied get it back. You actually reached 100% war exhaustion and didn't notice it. No-one else is at war with any of the federation members including the Ovarians. The Negotiate UI is. Its purpose is to shut down wars early so early wars won't trade too much away while late wars are quick affairs. Business, Economics, and Finance. In addition, whenever one side in a conflict reaches 100% war exhaustion the other will be able to force a Status Quo after 24 months. It should be a scaling modifier like in EU4. ago. corsairmarks. Not just because you need to build up to your fleet, but because they reduce war exhaustion from space battles. The AI doesn't have to surrender at 100% War Exhaustion either. I find. Your enemy War Exhaustion will not increase beyond 100%. I creamed them in every fight barely losing any ships but they still only have 4% higher "Space Battle" Exhaustion than me. I'm at war with another empire. There are dozens of ways to lower the accumulation of war exhaustion. Imagine declaring a war, taking all the territory you can. This is actually an issue with the AI (second empire totally passive in the war), not the exhaustion mechanic. Status Quo can be enforced by either side as soon as 24 months have passed since the opposing side reached 100% war exhaustion, and if both sides reach 100% war exhaustion, the Status Quo is enforced automatically after 24. 100% War Exhaustion allows you to force an enemy to accept a Status Quo. . I'm on good terms with them and they're huge. CryptoSince AI won't surrender to a Total War, they can end only in Status Quo or the destruction of one empire. And the AI only ends a war when both hit 100 %. so now even thought own all planets they will not give up. A couple of things. Nothing much happened, and I took a nearby undefended system…If you slap penalties on 100% war exhaustion, the smaller, losing side will accrue those penalties for the majority of the war's duration since they normally reach 100% WE very quickly due to, well, losing the war. The original empire has no reason to surrender as they are hoping the other empire will save them. Enforce a status quo. Your perfect start is ruined, you got the Irassians yet again. I won every single battle (land or space). Stellaris AAR: No Love, No Comfort. The war ends faster if the loss is acceptable, and more so if you have a solid hold over all your war goals. So I have a war going on against a faction and their ally. I am currently dominating a nation in a war, haven't lost a single system, but somehow they only have 10% w. That allows the attacker to force a status quo after 2 years. . • 2 yr. Declare War, invade system Take the outpost without a single ship lost and sit there with my fleet, ready to settle the war with my war goals achieved (the claim of this single system) - My enemy is a militarist xenophobe and just sits with his. War exhaustion . It favors the defender as a way to help ward off early aggression and give newer players the ability regroup. Technically is a bug, the R5 says they've been like this for several years, and 100% war exhaustion should force a white peace after 2 years. If one side reaches 100% they win by enforcing their war goals, same for the attacker and defender. Typically you don't "manage it". I am using the base game. It even had revanchism when you lost territory. You refuse the offer because you are sure you can conquer all it's planets and systems. This means that territories etc will all be reversed back to their pre-war status. I've been in two wars with the same enemy empire. If one side has 100%, a countdown starts and at the end of it the other side can force peace. . 24. War exhaustion, or a populaces dissatisfaction with war will increase with any losses even if a Battle is won. Honestly the mechanic isn't exactly perfect. I always had to wait till both sides have 100% of War Exhaustion. Ever try and invade a nation with an ally that didn't share a border? You'll have every system, every planet, a fleet to make them cry, and they're at 100 war exhaustion but refuse to give up. When someone reaches 100 exhaustion, the "winning" side can force status quo after 2 years. The problem is that you usually do not. The war exhaustion in this game does not work well. War Exhaustion is increased by destroying their fleets, as well as steadily over time. It depends on time and on losses you suffer, even in victory. Kempeorlaxan May 3, 2020 @ 1:26am War Exhaustion 100% Surrender Question I played as Terravore on higher difficulties - one of the advanced AI expanded very fast and. Maybe just crack their home planet to fully demoralize the survivors. While watching Arumba play apocalypse today he got into a war in which the AI forced him to 100% war exhaustion. War Exhaustion 100% means the AI will accept a Status Quo peace, nothing more. This also means that the two sides of the war might choose different war goals, and as such, the status quo resolution will have mixed rules. Yes, but only for the final stage, or if the Galactic Community declares a preemptive crisis war. Once a war side reaches 100% war exhaustion, there is now a 24 month timer that starts ticking down. War fatigue is specifically designed to make it hard for you to destroy big empires in 1 war, so it is doing its job. Change my mind. The war has been going on for about 2 years now, but our enemies reached 100% exhaustion quite awhile ago, and are not surrendering. War exhaustion contributes a bit to it, but is otherwise irrelevant for beating an opponent. war exhaustion will give a modifier towards accepting peace offers but you cannot be forced to surrender Then how do. As the game goes on, empires accumulate tech and traditions that lower the accumulation rate for war exhaustion meaning the wars will drag on longer. An amazing starting area with great habitable planets, a perfect choke point, no nearby powerhouses to threaten you. The system is a little strange, but there is a logic behind it. I have two planets that are under occupation and I pushed them out of territory I owned and they have taken significant. #7. Crisis empires get the -75% war exhaustion bonus at stage two, when they can still wage normal wars and well before triggering the galaxy-wide total war. They have 2 planets left and I'm occupying both of them. They always have my war exhaustion up by 5-7% more than their own. You get bonus influence from them surrendering if you choose the humiliate war goal. So losing a battleship hurts more than losing a corvette. GameStop Moderna Pfizer Johnson & Johnson AstraZeneca Walgreens Best Buy Novavax SpaceX Tesla. They. Paradox Forum. 2. -100 for surrender, -50 for subjugate. Even worse, I occupy many of his planets,. Like here. Question. Problem is having max war exhaustion cause unrest isn't really tenable with the way the game works now. You are in a race if you want to conquer someone in a single go. 1 aspect I'm missing or seems counter intuitive to me is the war exhaustion mechanic. Eventually its +100 from exhaustion so still -50. Nothing else changes about the war. The fact that you are at war with a xeno empire does affect politics and ethic attraction, winning/ surrender does the same. But no, they just give 0. But if you are at 5% attrition or 80% does not make a difference. As for you vs them there are 3 main factors. If you have 100 fleet cap you get. Especially now that somehow AI seems to rampantly Vassalize to a degree that I cannot comprehend how they make such agreements, it's very hard to be in a war with only 1 or 2 enemies. If you have ten corvettes each ship lost is 10% exhaustion added for each lost, if you have 100 each corvette lost is only 1% war exhaustion. . They are also less likely to surrender. A Status Quo Peace is you get to keep whatever claimed systems. Maraudeur. When a war side's War Exhaustion hits 100%, they can be forced into a Status Quo peace (more on this below). (by your opponent) And 24 months after your opponent hits 100% exhaustion, your opponent can be forced into Status Quo (by you, but that nearly never comes up because the AI always accepts at 100% itself). It only starts to matter if you're the attacker, both sides get to 100% and you haven't achieved all your goals yet. The. War score is the measure of 'winning' a war. That is not a Status Quo Peace. Meanwhile, the winner will usually get to 100% war exhaustion more slowly so he gets the ability to force peace at an opportunate moment first. War Exhaustion is terrible. Don't think of war exhaustion as an estimator of winning/losing, war exhaustion if it was to be broken down to its fundamental functionality, it is a timer, when this timer reaches its end the war can now be forced to end for the side that reached it. Even tho I’m running laps around their alliance, I can’t win. 3 is based off the fleet value of the ship and your ship capacity. The number of armies that can be engaged in combat on either side is five plus one-fifth of the planet size. Yeah, they really need to make spotting unconquered claims easier, especially in wars where your ally made the claims. You have the perfect start. Agreed the war exhaustion system is fucked up, I have lost systems to the enemy while beating him to hands down he got no fleets left but I can't manage to tag back a system that he he took with a stray troop and suddenly the war is over and he wins the system and I cant do anything and I get none of his systems because I hadn't claimed. They don't have ships or fleets anymore. 4 # Multiplier of war exhaustion gained from land battles (armies) - Was 0. AFAIK there is only one condition for forced surrender : all your planets are under enemy control. However even several years after reaching 100% exhaustion. All in all, a very frustrating experience. Militarists just shoot more. CryptoThe first person to hit 100% war exhaustion can only surrender when the other party lets them do it. I've been in two wars with the same enemy empire. #11. You can go to the war screen and demand some/all of your objectives at any time during the war. Claims change hands as normal in EVERY type of war. In another game an AI had 1 system, one planet. The war exhaustion in this. War exhaustion should be an empire modifier rather than a war score knockoff. To be exact, they are forced to ACCEPT a status quo. OgamiGoro Apr 13, 2020 @ 1:37pm. If you look closely, there is a small separation between the bottom of the War Exhaustion box and the Occupation tracker. so. The act of surrendering is to abdicate to your demands in their entirety, you didn't want much, so you didn't get much. But then you see the dreaded pop up. 5 war exhaustion. That would get rid of the problem of. They always have my war exhaustion up by 5-7% more than their own. 1 Giltiriel • 5 yr. The war exhaustion in this game does not work well. After that, I jump to their capital planets to cut off their production. Business, Economics, and Finance. I am just wrapping up my first game, which involved a LOT of wars with a LOT of hostile empires that happened to spawn on my doorstep, and I have come to the conclusion that I either grossly misunderstand how the updated war exhaustion works or the. No you don't understand I think- the war doesn't have to end in a surrender. I set it to fastest and am just waiting for them it to tick to 100% but GOD it's ticking slow. Is anyone else finding it difficult to raise the war exhaustion of the enemy? I went to war with an empire that had less ships and far less tech. There are no other mechanisms tied to it. The last one technology is a technology that reduces your fatigue by 10% and is extremely useful. Capture everything, and do it fast. I am waging a war for claims as my. . Once their war exhaustion reaches 100%, you can force a status quo peace. The exhaustion percentage is creeping up so slowly that it will probably be a hundred years before it gets to 100 percent and hopefully the Caloctora will surrender even though the Fallen Empire hasn't done a thing to them. To actually force surrender, you would have to occupy literally their entire empire, plus all of their allies in the war. The problem is that the gains are too high from certain things and it doesn't really care. 100% War Exhaustion just means that who ever reaches this state, has to accept a status quo peace. War exhaustion in Stellaris is just a mechanic to prevent foreverwars between the AI and the player exploiting the AI through war too. At this point I have taken roughly little over half their systems, including having landed troops and occupying the planets I control. Wars aren’t fun at all in this game and it’s because the associated mechanics are such a fucking slog that make shit like a border war for 4 systems turn into a drawn out. Originally posted by Agent Orange: When an empire or alliance in a war reaches 100% war exhaustion, it can be forced into a status quo peace if you want to. Novaseerblyat • Machine Intelligence • 6 mo. ago. For impose ideology, all systems you fully occupy will be turned into an empire with your ethics. Ship and army loses, occupation and technology. It is written that if your war exhaustion reaches 100% you may be forced to peace after 2 years. Same thing can happen with 2 players. Feb 21, 2020;. After invading every planet and capturing all their systems the war ends with status quo. There's a war exhaustion calculation weirdness. I have two planets that are under occupation and I pushed them out of territory I owned and they have taken significant. No one wants to keep fighting forever. WAR_EXHAUSTION_SHIP_KILLED_MULT = 0. Usually an AI empire will become willing to voluntarily surrender well before you reach that point. NuclearKiwix • 1 yr. Posted by u/untrustedlife2 - 768 votes and 204 commentsHonestly, this won't really change much to the OP's issue, since full war exhaustion will still force a peace. -----3) Disengage and Emergency Retreat While these are technically combat mechanics, they certainly play a role considering how crucial 1) is. Warfare in Stellaris can only end in one of three ways. You declare a war, take your claims, then white piece out. Or, at least, this has been my experience. :) Remember we're always looking for more suggestions and constructive criticism:. Both planets are heavily defended but I manage to take. I agree that some war goals, like vassalize, are stupidly hard to complete vs more than one enemy, but the logic of why they won't surrender is very easy to understand. In case nobody was following the war exhaustion thread, here's the formula the game apparently uses to decide how much war exhaustion is suffered after a space battle: 1. I am totally crushing them. 3+ fleets. The lack of negotiated peace settlements make the 'wack a mole' nature of warfare really bad, because making the AI surrender is completely out of the question unless you utterly crush them (-300 for demanding unoccupied planets, lol) and surrender is the only war goal where the enemy doesn't get it's currently occupied claims, so you. I creamed them in every fight barely losing any ships but they still only have 4% higher "Space Battle" Exhaustion than me. 86 votes, 20 comments. The enemy was virtually forced to inaction: in my war, 65% of their WE came from occupation (49 systems, 12 colonies). HoI4 is explicitly a war game. They won't accept defeat when I offer them the achieve war goals option, because I've claimed every. GameStop Moderna Pfizer Johnson & Johnson AstraZeneca Walgreens Best Buy Novavax SpaceX Tesla. Also the fact that claims and capitol dont have very much weight in comparison. No acceptance is the same (function wise) in both games. Base War exhaustion is 3x faster. A system where offering surrender lowered your War Exhaustion (on a time limit) and refusing enemy surrender increased it would also go a long way towards preventing the 'griefing' style of play that people were so worried about when forced peace was (thankfully) removed. Both planets are heavily defended but I. Usually I find they won't accept due to demanding unoccupied systems/planets. i joined a war as a third party and attacked them. So what ends up happening, is that once you take the war exhaustion to it's limit (+100), it cancels out the system penalty. Usually if. GameStop Moderna Pfizer Johnson & Johnson AstraZeneca Walgreens Best Buy Novavax SpaceX Tesla. My war exhaustion is at like 13% for both sides. Every other paradox game has War Score which is basically a track of who is winning and by how much. no, there is no forced surrender. Nothing happens-- 10% chance. Mainly. What he did was a very good tactical decision. the other attacking enemy was on like 100% war exhaustion. -----3) Disengage and Emergency Retreat While these are technically combat mechanics, they certainly play a role considering how crucial 1) is. 1 more reply. I have two planets that are under occupation and I pushed them out of territory I owned and they have taken significant. Why is my war exhaustion going up despite buffs, traditions, and not getting even close to losing. War exhaustion is not a measure of success or 'winning'. white peace is your goal in war for Stellaris. 631. Your ally, not you, was the war leader and he forced peace when he got. I decimate my enemies' fleets completely.